Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
The article addresses profiteering and computation of profiteering focusing on pass-through of input tax credit (ITC) where the flat was booked post-GST. Applying judicial guidance, the DGAP examined ITC availed and pre- and post-GST purchase values and concluded no contravention of section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, because the price was set after ITC availability and no enforceable right arose for the purchaser merely from a seller's confirmation to pass on ITC; the applicant's objections were examined and rejected as without merit.
The article addresses profiteering and computation of profiteering focusing on pass-through of input tax credit (ITC) where the flat was booked post-GST. Applying judicial guidance, the DGAP examined ITC availed and pre- and post-GST purchase values and concluded no contravention of section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, because the price was set after ITC availability and no enforceable right arose for the purchaser merely from a seller's confirmation to pass on ITC; the applicant's objections were examined and rejected as without merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.