Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The article addresses profiteering and computation of profiteering focusing on pass-through of input tax credit (ITC) where the flat was booked post-GST. Applying judicial guidance, the DGAP examined ITC availed and pre- and post-GST purchase values and concluded no contravention of section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, because the price was set after ITC availability and no enforceable right arose for the purchaser merely from a seller's confirmation to pass on ITC; the applicant's objections were examined and rejected as without merit.
The article addresses profiteering and computation of profiteering focusing on pass-through of input tax credit (ITC) where the flat was booked post-GST. Applying judicial guidance, the DGAP examined ITC availed and pre- and post-GST purchase values and concluded no contravention of section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, because the price was set after ITC availability and no enforceable right arose for the purchaser merely from a seller's confirmation to pass on ITC; the applicant's objections were examined and rejected as without merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.