Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Consolidation of multiple financial years/tax periods into a single show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act was contested; the court preferred subsequent Bombay High Court decisions finding such consolidation impermissible, holding that authorities within the State are bound by those later judgments and that the Delhi High Court decision does not operate as a merger where the Supreme Court dismissed review in limine. The court permitted respondents to revive the petition if Bombay High Court decisions are set aside and expressly allowed reissuance of notice strictly in terms of Section 74 if no other legal impediment exists.
Consolidation of multiple financial years/tax periods into a single show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act was contested; the court preferred subsequent Bombay High Court decisions finding such consolidation impermissible, holding that authorities within the State are bound by those later judgments and that the Delhi High Court decision does not operate as a merger where the Supreme Court dismissed review in limine. The court permitted respondents to revive the petition if Bombay High Court decisions are set aside and expressly allowed reissuance of notice strictly in terms of Section 74 if no other legal impediment exists.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
