Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Consolidation of multiple financial years/tax periods into a single show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act was contested; the court preferred subsequent Bombay High Court decisions finding such consolidation impermissible, holding that authorities within the State are bound by those later judgments and that the Delhi High Court decision does not operate as a merger where the Supreme Court dismissed review in limine. The court permitted respondents to revive the petition if Bombay High Court decisions are set aside and expressly allowed reissuance of notice strictly in terms of Section 74 if no other legal impediment exists.
Consolidation of multiple financial years/tax periods into a single show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act was contested; the court preferred subsequent Bombay High Court decisions finding such consolidation impermissible, holding that authorities within the State are bound by those later judgments and that the Delhi High Court decision does not operate as a merger where the Supreme Court dismissed review in limine. The court permitted respondents to revive the petition if Bombay High Court decisions are set aside and expressly allowed reissuance of notice strictly in terms of Section 74 if no other legal impediment exists.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
