Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme interpretation clarified that 'dispute' must be read broadly to include any pending appeal, including appeals against penalty orders, thereby bringing such appeals within scheme eligibility; this interpretation advances the scheme's beneficial object and requires departmental consistency where spousal apportionment of income under applicable matrimonial law is governed similarly, resulting in entitlement to settlement where co-claimant spouse obtained benefit; delays due to COVID and filings made while the scheme subsisted do not defeat eligibility, and exercise of writ jurisdiction is appropriate to secure scheme relief in such circumstances.
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme interpretation clarified that 'dispute' must be read broadly to include any pending appeal, including appeals against penalty orders, thereby bringing such appeals within scheme eligibility; this interpretation advances the scheme's beneficial object and requires departmental consistency where spousal apportionment of income under applicable matrimonial law is governed similarly, resulting in entitlement to settlement where co-claimant spouse obtained benefit; delays due to COVID and filings made while the scheme subsisted do not defeat eligibility, and exercise of writ jurisdiction is appropriate to secure scheme relief in such circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
