Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Validity of an ICDS adjustment was challenged on the basis that the intimation under the income tax intimation procedure was issued without giving the assessee prior written or electronic notice and without considering the assessees response. The court found that the first and second provisos require notice of a proposed adjustment and consideration of any reply before making adjustments; absence of such notice and opportunity to be heard violated the principles of natural justice. Consequently the ICDS adjustment in the intimation was quashed.
Validity of an ICDS adjustment was challenged on the basis that the intimation under the income tax intimation procedure was issued without giving the assessee prior written or electronic notice and without considering the assessees response. The court found that the first and second provisos require notice of a proposed adjustment and consideration of any reply before making adjustments; absence of such notice and opportunity to be heard violated the principles of natural justice. Consequently the ICDS adjustment in the intimation was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
