Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Decision addresses entitlement to deduction under Chapter VI-A (80P) and holds that the statutory scheme requires the claim for such deduction to be made in the return of income and that the return must be filed within the due date under the relevant return-filing provision. The court rejects the contention that absence of any return exempts an assessee from the bar in sub-section (5) and, applying a conjoint reading with the companion provision, concludes that failure to file a timely return or to claim the deduction in the return precludes allowance of the deduction; the tribunals application of that approach was upheld.
Decision addresses entitlement to deduction under Chapter VI-A (80P) and holds that the statutory scheme requires the claim for such deduction to be made in the return of income and that the return must be filed within the due date under the relevant return-filing provision. The court rejects the contention that absence of any return exempts an assessee from the bar in sub-section (5) and, applying a conjoint reading with the companion provision, concludes that failure to file a timely return or to claim the deduction in the return precludes allowance of the deduction; the tribunals application of that approach was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.