Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Decision addresses entitlement to deduction under Chapter VI-A (80P) and holds that the statutory scheme requires the claim for such deduction to be made in the return of income and that the return must be filed within the due date under the relevant return-filing provision. The court rejects the contention that absence of any return exempts an assessee from the bar in sub-section (5) and, applying a conjoint reading with the companion provision, concludes that failure to file a timely return or to claim the deduction in the return precludes allowance of the deduction; the tribunals application of that approach was upheld.
Decision addresses entitlement to deduction under Chapter VI-A (80P) and holds that the statutory scheme requires the claim for such deduction to be made in the return of income and that the return must be filed within the due date under the relevant return-filing provision. The court rejects the contention that absence of any return exempts an assessee from the bar in sub-section (5) and, applying a conjoint reading with the companion provision, concludes that failure to file a timely return or to claim the deduction in the return precludes allowance of the deduction; the tribunals application of that approach was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.