Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Interplay between the Limitation Act and the UP GST Act concerns exclusion of limitation where a special statutory power to condone delay exists and where a bona fide rectification application is prosecuted with due diligence. The court reasons that a specific condonation power in the special Act operates to displace the general Section 5 principle, and that filing a timely application for rectification of an order puts the limitation to file an appeal in abeyance during its pendency; because the rectification application was filed within time and pursued in good faith, the pendency period is excluded and the subsequent appeal was held within limitation.
Interplay between the Limitation Act and the UP GST Act concerns exclusion of limitation where a special statutory power to condone delay exists and where a bona fide rectification application is prosecuted with due diligence. The court reasons that a specific condonation power in the special Act operates to displace the general Section 5 principle, and that filing a timely application for rectification of an order puts the limitation to file an appeal in abeyance during its pendency; because the rectification application was filed within time and pursued in good faith, the pendency period is excluded and the subsequent appeal was held within limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
