Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Territorial jurisdiction for Article 226 writs was held to arise where the competent Regional Authority sits, since the Customs officer performed only a ministerial forwarding function; consequence: the High Court entertained writ petitions challenging denial of Merchandise Exports from India Scheme benefits caused by a clerical/electronic EDI error. The Regional Authority at Jaipur was identified as the competent adjudicatory authority and directed to accept resubmitted online applications converting the option from N to Y and to process claims on merits, reflecting the principle that entitlement should not be defeated by ministerial or technical default.
Territorial jurisdiction for Article 226 writs was held to arise where the competent Regional Authority sits, since the Customs officer performed only a ministerial forwarding function; consequence: the High Court entertained writ petitions challenging denial of Merchandise Exports from India Scheme benefits caused by a clerical/electronic EDI error. The Regional Authority at Jaipur was identified as the competent adjudicatory authority and directed to accept resubmitted online applications converting the option from N to Y and to process claims on merits, reflecting the principle that entitlement should not be defeated by ministerial or technical default.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
