Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
An F-card holder was recognised as entitled to practise before any Customs jurisdiction, and a communication clause restricting practice to a single division was set aside as lacking legal authority; that restriction is therefore invalidated. Deficiencies in the licence application identified by the licensing authority remain unaltered, and the applicant has undertaken to remedy those deficiencies, with resultant administrative compliance required. The matter was disposed and related miscellaneous petitions closed.
An F-card holder was recognised as entitled to practise before any Customs jurisdiction, and a communication clause restricting practice to a single division was set aside as lacking legal authority; that restriction is therefore invalidated. Deficiencies in the licence application identified by the licensing authority remain unaltered, and the applicant has undertaken to remedy those deficiencies, with resultant administrative compliance required. The matter was disposed and related miscellaneous petitions closed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.