Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
An F-card holder was recognised as entitled to practise before any Customs jurisdiction, and a communication clause restricting practice to a single division was set aside as lacking legal authority; that restriction is therefore invalidated. Deficiencies in the licence application identified by the licensing authority remain unaltered, and the applicant has undertaken to remedy those deficiencies, with resultant administrative compliance required. The matter was disposed and related miscellaneous petitions closed.
An F-card holder was recognised as entitled to practise before any Customs jurisdiction, and a communication clause restricting practice to a single division was set aside as lacking legal authority; that restriction is therefore invalidated. Deficiencies in the licence application identified by the licensing authority remain unaltered, and the applicant has undertaken to remedy those deficiencies, with resultant administrative compliance required. The matter was disposed and related miscellaneous petitions closed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.