Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Prima facie determination on alleged violation of input tax credit conditions under Section 16(4) was negated by a retrospective statutory amendment inserting clarificatory provisions, and an earlier confirmed demand for 2018-19 was rectified by a subsequent order, leaving only a reduced demand. Separately, interest levied for belated tax payment and late filing of GSTR-3B was upheld as correctly imposed under the GST regime, leaving no scope for interference. Consequent writ relief was refused and the petition dismissed.
Prima facie determination on alleged violation of input tax credit conditions under Section 16(4) was negated by a retrospective statutory amendment inserting clarificatory provisions, and an earlier confirmed demand for 2018-19 was rectified by a subsequent order, leaving only a reduced demand. Separately, interest levied for belated tax payment and late filing of GSTR-3B was upheld as correctly imposed under the GST regime, leaving no scope for interference. Consequent writ relief was refused and the petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.