Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Prima facie determination on alleged violation of input tax credit conditions under Section 16(4) was negated by a retrospective statutory amendment inserting clarificatory provisions, and an earlier confirmed demand for 2018-19 was rectified by a subsequent order, leaving only a reduced demand. Separately, interest levied for belated tax payment and late filing of GSTR-3B was upheld as correctly imposed under the GST regime, leaving no scope for interference. Consequent writ relief was refused and the petition dismissed.
Prima facie determination on alleged violation of input tax credit conditions under Section 16(4) was negated by a retrospective statutory amendment inserting clarificatory provisions, and an earlier confirmed demand for 2018-19 was rectified by a subsequent order, leaving only a reduced demand. Separately, interest levied for belated tax payment and late filing of GSTR-3B was upheld as correctly imposed under the GST regime, leaving no scope for interference. Consequent writ relief was refused and the petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
