Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Prima facie determination on alleged violation of input tax credit conditions under Section 16(4) was negated by a retrospective statutory amendment inserting clarificatory provisions, and an earlier confirmed demand for 2018-19 was rectified by a subsequent order, leaving only a reduced demand. Separately, interest levied for belated tax payment and late filing of GSTR-3B was upheld as correctly imposed under the GST regime, leaving no scope for interference. Consequent writ relief was refused and the petition dismissed.
Prima facie determination on alleged violation of input tax credit conditions under Section 16(4) was negated by a retrospective statutory amendment inserting clarificatory provisions, and an earlier confirmed demand for 2018-19 was rectified by a subsequent order, leaving only a reduced demand. Separately, interest levied for belated tax payment and late filing of GSTR-3B was upheld as correctly imposed under the GST regime, leaving no scope for interference. Consequent writ relief was refused and the petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.