Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Section 75(4) of the GST regime requires that an opportunity of hearing be granted upon receipt of a request; failure to afford a personal hearing renders the impugned action procedurally infirm and susceptible to challenge. Where the authority refusing advance rulings is hierarchically superior to the appellate authority, the alternative remedy is ineffective as a practical and legal recourse, permitting invocation of constitutional relief. The practical effect is that absence of procedural hearing and an ineffective alternative remedy justifies setting aside the impugned administrative order.
Section 75(4) of the GST regime requires that an opportunity of hearing be granted upon receipt of a request; failure to afford a personal hearing renders the impugned action procedurally infirm and susceptible to challenge. Where the authority refusing advance rulings is hierarchically superior to the appellate authority, the alternative remedy is ineffective as a practical and legal recourse, permitting invocation of constitutional relief. The practical effect is that absence of procedural hearing and an ineffective alternative remedy justifies setting aside the impugned administrative order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
