Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Dispute concerns whether increased coal handling coordination and liaisoning charges imposed via three third-party entities constituted abuse of dominance by the port operator. The analysis treats the relevant product and geographic market as limited to the port operator alone, finding it dominant. Evidence from multiple users and the DG established the charges were mandatory during 201112 to 201415 and that the third parties were controlled in conduct by the same group, producing an appreciable adverse effect on competition. Consequently the impugned CCI order is set aside and the matter remanded to the CCI for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard.
Dispute concerns whether increased coal handling coordination and liaisoning charges imposed via three third-party entities constituted abuse of dominance by the port operator. The analysis treats the relevant product and geographic market as limited to the port operator alone, finding it dominant. Evidence from multiple users and the DG established the charges were mandatory during 201112 to 201415 and that the third parties were controlled in conduct by the same group, producing an appreciable adverse effect on competition. Consequently the impugned CCI order is set aside and the matter remanded to the CCI for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
