Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Challenge concerning detention and release under the UPGST regime, service of statutory notices via an online portal, and remittance for fresh appellate decision. The respondents assert notices and hearing dates were uploaded to the portal, constituting communication; consequence: the appellate process requires remittance for a fresh decision. Presence of parties counsel is treated as imputed knowledge of the interim order; consequence: benefits of the order apply only if the petitioner complies strictly with stipulated timelines and conditions. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
Challenge concerning detention and release under the UPGST regime, service of statutory notices via an online portal, and remittance for fresh appellate decision. The respondents assert notices and hearing dates were uploaded to the portal, constituting communication; consequence: the appellate process requires remittance for a fresh decision. Presence of parties counsel is treated as imputed knowledge of the interim order; consequence: benefits of the order apply only if the petitioner complies strictly with stipulated timelines and conditions. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.