Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Challenge concerning detention and release under the UPGST regime, service of statutory notices via an online portal, and remittance for fresh appellate decision. The respondents assert notices and hearing dates were uploaded to the portal, constituting communication; consequence: the appellate process requires remittance for a fresh decision. Presence of parties counsel is treated as imputed knowledge of the interim order; consequence: benefits of the order apply only if the petitioner complies strictly with stipulated timelines and conditions. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
Challenge concerning detention and release under the UPGST regime, service of statutory notices via an online portal, and remittance for fresh appellate decision. The respondents assert notices and hearing dates were uploaded to the portal, constituting communication; consequence: the appellate process requires remittance for a fresh decision. Presence of parties counsel is treated as imputed knowledge of the interim order; consequence: benefits of the order apply only if the petitioner complies strictly with stipulated timelines and conditions. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.