Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Challenge concerning detention and release under the UPGST regime, service of statutory notices via an online portal, and remittance for fresh appellate decision. The respondents assert notices and hearing dates were uploaded to the portal, constituting communication; consequence: the appellate process requires remittance for a fresh decision. Presence of parties counsel is treated as imputed knowledge of the interim order; consequence: benefits of the order apply only if the petitioner complies strictly with stipulated timelines and conditions. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
Challenge concerning detention and release under the UPGST regime, service of statutory notices via an online portal, and remittance for fresh appellate decision. The respondents assert notices and hearing dates were uploaded to the portal, constituting communication; consequence: the appellate process requires remittance for a fresh decision. Presence of parties counsel is treated as imputed knowledge of the interim order; consequence: benefits of the order apply only if the petitioner complies strictly with stipulated timelines and conditions. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.