Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Eligibility for Input Tax Credit was reconsidered in light of retrospective insertion of provisions into the GST enactments, the legal basis being the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 rendering the issue subject to fresh merits scrutiny; consequence: assessment quashed and matter remitted for re-examination of entitlement to ITC notwithstanding belated availment. The prospect of waiver of interest and penalty under the relevant statutory provision was noted as a collateral relief subject to reconsideration. Writ jurisdiction was exercised to set aside the impugned assessment and direct expeditious fresh decision on merits by the assessing authority.
Eligibility for Input Tax Credit was reconsidered in light of retrospective insertion of provisions into the GST enactments, the legal basis being the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 rendering the issue subject to fresh merits scrutiny; consequence: assessment quashed and matter remitted for re-examination of entitlement to ITC notwithstanding belated availment. The prospect of waiver of interest and penalty under the relevant statutory provision was noted as a collateral relief subject to reconsideration. Writ jurisdiction was exercised to set aside the impugned assessment and direct expeditious fresh decision on merits by the assessing authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
