Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Long-term capital loss claimed on sale of shares was contested by the assessing officer for lack of documentary proof and questioned valuation; the tribunal found that the assessee produced an independent valuation and net asset value showed sale prices exceeded NAV, and the revenue failed to produce alternative valuation or rebuttal during assessment, appeal or remand proceedings, entitling the assessee to recognition of the LTCL. The AOs selective acceptance of identical losses elsewhere and failure to undertake or furnish its own valuation led to upholding the appellate authoritys allowance of the loss.
Long-term capital loss claimed on sale of shares was contested by the assessing officer for lack of documentary proof and questioned valuation; the tribunal found that the assessee produced an independent valuation and net asset value showed sale prices exceeded NAV, and the revenue failed to produce alternative valuation or rebuttal during assessment, appeal or remand proceedings, entitling the assessee to recognition of the LTCL. The AOs selective acceptance of identical losses elsewhere and failure to undertake or furnish its own valuation led to upholding the appellate authoritys allowance of the loss.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
