Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.