Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.