Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
