Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
The dispute concerned whether the limitation for passing a final assessment under the transfer pricing assessment procedure must be measured solely by the timeline in the specific transfer pricing provision or by reference to both that provision and the general assessment limitation provision; the tribunal concluded that the provisions are mutually inclusive and overlapping, and limitation must be determined with reference to both provisions, resulting in final assessment orders issued beyond the combined limitation period being without jurisdiction and quashed for the specified assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.