Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Profiteering in sale of residential units and obligation to pass on input tax credit under Section 171 is examined, with area-based computation adopted and rejection of an ITC-to-turnover ratio. The investigation under Rule 129 and DGAP report quantified a profiteered amount of Rs. 40,096, requiring refund and proportionate distribution to 1,865 eligible buyers; the respondent accepted the report and agreed to comply. Interest on the profiteered amount under Rule 133(3)(b) and filing of a compliance report to DGAP and the jurisdictional GST Commissioner are directed as operative consequences.
Profiteering in sale of residential units and obligation to pass on input tax credit under Section 171 is examined, with area-based computation adopted and rejection of an ITC-to-turnover ratio. The investigation under Rule 129 and DGAP report quantified a profiteered amount of Rs. 40,096, requiring refund and proportionate distribution to 1,865 eligible buyers; the respondent accepted the report and agreed to comply. Interest on the profiteered amount under Rule 133(3)(b) and filing of a compliance report to DGAP and the jurisdictional GST Commissioner are directed as operative consequences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.