Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Profiteering in sale of residential units and obligation to pass on input tax credit under Section 171 is examined, with area-based computation adopted and rejection of an ITC-to-turnover ratio. The investigation under Rule 129 and DGAP report quantified a profiteered amount of Rs. 40,096, requiring refund and proportionate distribution to 1,865 eligible buyers; the respondent accepted the report and agreed to comply. Interest on the profiteered amount under Rule 133(3)(b) and filing of a compliance report to DGAP and the jurisdictional GST Commissioner are directed as operative consequences.
Profiteering in sale of residential units and obligation to pass on input tax credit under Section 171 is examined, with area-based computation adopted and rejection of an ITC-to-turnover ratio. The investigation under Rule 129 and DGAP report quantified a profiteered amount of Rs. 40,096, requiring refund and proportionate distribution to 1,865 eligible buyers; the respondent accepted the report and agreed to comply. Interest on the profiteered amount under Rule 133(3)(b) and filing of a compliance report to DGAP and the jurisdictional GST Commissioner are directed as operative consequences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.