Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Reopening of assessment challenged on the ground that reasons to believe lacked a live evidentiary link between seized materials and the assessee; the AO relied on statements and a brokers register suggesting a cash on money component and a unit rate, but those documents did not name the co-owner or the assessee. The AOs computation accepted the assessees 30% share, yet the asserted intent to sell the entire plot earlier conflicted with subsequent gift transactions by the co-owner. For lack of independent corroborative material connecting the assessee to the alleged on-money transaction, the impugned notice was quashed.
Reopening of assessment challenged on the ground that reasons to believe lacked a live evidentiary link between seized materials and the assessee; the AO relied on statements and a brokers register suggesting a cash on money component and a unit rate, but those documents did not name the co-owner or the assessee. The AOs computation accepted the assessees 30% share, yet the asserted intent to sell the entire plot earlier conflicted with subsequent gift transactions by the co-owner. For lack of independent corroborative material connecting the assessee to the alleged on-money transaction, the impugned notice was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
