Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.