Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.