Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
