Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5641 to 5660 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Denial of TDS credit arising from a Form 26AS mismatch was challenged; ITAT found documentary evidence that the Karta of an HUF and an HUF member had not claimed the TDS credit in their respective returns and that lower authorities failed to appreciate this. On that basis the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the assessing officer for de novo adjudication to examine whether the TDS credit was unclaimed by each return-filer, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.