Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Admission of additional evidence under Rule 29 of ITAT Rules was allowed and admitted. Non-deduction of tax at source was considered: for two payees, production and departmental verification of TDS certificates established that the assessee is not in default, and the demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) relating to those payments were deleted. For two other payees, a 30% disallowance of expenditure for non-deduction was upheld and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute any liability accordingly. Verification of TDS return filing was ordered and fee under section 234E to be deleted if return was timely.
Admission of additional evidence under Rule 29 of ITAT Rules was allowed and admitted. Non-deduction of tax at source was considered: for two payees, production and departmental verification of TDS certificates established that the assessee is not in default, and the demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) relating to those payments were deleted. For two other payees, a 30% disallowance of expenditure for non-deduction was upheld and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute any liability accordingly. Verification of TDS return filing was ordered and fee under section 234E to be deleted if return was timely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.