Vehicle expense apportionment and agricultural income substantiation: ITAT allowed partial business deduction and deleted the reclassification additio...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5261 to 5280 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Admission of additional evidence under Rule 29 of ITAT Rules was allowed and admitted. Non-deduction of tax at source was considered: for two payees, production and departmental verification of TDS certificates established that the assessee is not in default, and the demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) relating to those payments were deleted. For two other payees, a 30% disallowance of expenditure for non-deduction was upheld and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute any liability accordingly. Verification of TDS return filing was ordered and fee under section 234E to be deleted if return was timely.
Admission of additional evidence under Rule 29 of ITAT Rules was allowed and admitted. Non-deduction of tax at source was considered: for two payees, production and departmental verification of TDS certificates established that the assessee is not in default, and the demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) relating to those payments were deleted. For two other payees, a 30% disallowance of expenditure for non-deduction was upheld and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute any liability accordingly. Verification of TDS return filing was ordered and fee under section 234E to be deleted if return was timely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.