Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.