Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.