Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.