Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
