Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Treatment of unaccounted investment in immovable property turned on whether a bank valuation report constituted incriminating material in a search assessment; appellate authority found no incriminating material and sustained deletion of additions disallowing reliance on that valuation. Separate STCG adjustment based on AO's adoption of the DVO estimate at 120% (20% escalation) was held to be a baseless simplicitor estimation; the appellate authority rejected the enhanced valuation and deleted the STCG addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.