Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
ITAT addressed penalty under 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice under section 142(1); it found that the assessee, a farmer represented through an advocate, did not receive communications due to non-payment of advocate fees and absence of physical service, constituting a reasonable cause under the statutory exception, and the Revenue conceded non-service. The consequence is deletion of the Rs. 10,000 penalty levied under 272A(1)(d), deciding in favour of the assessee.
ITAT addressed penalty under 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice under section 142(1); it found that the assessee, a farmer represented through an advocate, did not receive communications due to non-payment of advocate fees and absence of physical service, constituting a reasonable cause under the statutory exception, and the Revenue conceded non-service. The consequence is deletion of the Rs. 10,000 penalty levied under 272A(1)(d), deciding in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
