Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
ITAT addressed penalty under 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice under section 142(1); it found that the assessee, a farmer represented through an advocate, did not receive communications due to non-payment of advocate fees and absence of physical service, constituting a reasonable cause under the statutory exception, and the Revenue conceded non-service. The consequence is deletion of the Rs. 10,000 penalty levied under 272A(1)(d), deciding in favour of the assessee.
ITAT addressed penalty under 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice under section 142(1); it found that the assessee, a farmer represented through an advocate, did not receive communications due to non-payment of advocate fees and absence of physical service, constituting a reasonable cause under the statutory exception, and the Revenue conceded non-service. The consequence is deletion of the Rs. 10,000 penalty levied under 272A(1)(d), deciding in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
