Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
ITAT addressed penalty under 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice under section 142(1); it found that the assessee, a farmer represented through an advocate, did not receive communications due to non-payment of advocate fees and absence of physical service, constituting a reasonable cause under the statutory exception, and the Revenue conceded non-service. The consequence is deletion of the Rs. 10,000 penalty levied under 272A(1)(d), deciding in favour of the assessee.
ITAT addressed penalty under 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice under section 142(1); it found that the assessee, a farmer represented through an advocate, did not receive communications due to non-payment of advocate fees and absence of physical service, constituting a reasonable cause under the statutory exception, and the Revenue conceded non-service. The consequence is deletion of the Rs. 10,000 penalty levied under 272A(1)(d), deciding in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
