Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Dispute concerned disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for directors' salaries
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Dispute concerned disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for alleged unreasonable managerial remuneration alleged as a device for tax evasion; the assessing officer relied on comparative salary analysis of directors and senior executives to disallow excess payments, concluding payments were distribution of profits in the form of salarythis finding led to a quantified excess disallowance. The appellate authority deleted the addition, rejecting the assessing officer's conclusion and observing tax payment by company and directors; the matter was decided in favour of the assessee, restoring the deletion of the disallowance.
Dispute concerned disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for alleged unreasonable managerial remuneration alleged as a device for tax evasion; the assessing officer relied on comparative salary analysis of directors and senior executives to disallow excess payments, concluding payments were distribution of profits in the form of salarythis finding led to a quantified excess disallowance. The appellate authority deleted the addition, rejecting the assessing officer's conclusion and observing tax payment by company and directors; the matter was decided in favour of the assessee, restoring the deletion of the disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
