Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Remittance of a GST demand alleging misuse of GST credentials was ordered back for fresh adjudication on merits, conditioned on the taxpayer depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within thirty days; upon compliance the respondent must pass a final order on merits expeditiously and the bank attachment will be vacated. The taxpayer must also file a substantive reply to the show cause notice within the same period treating the impugned order as an addendum. Failure to comply permits the respondent to recover tax as if the petition were dismissed.
Remittance of a GST demand alleging misuse of GST credentials was ordered back for fresh adjudication on merits, conditioned on the taxpayer depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within thirty days; upon compliance the respondent must pass a final order on merits expeditiously and the bank attachment will be vacated. The taxpayer must also file a substantive reply to the show cause notice within the same period treating the impugned order as an addendum. Failure to comply permits the respondent to recover tax as if the petition were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.