Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Remittance of a GST demand alleging misuse of GST credentials was ordered back for fresh adjudication on merits, conditioned on the taxpayer depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within thirty days; upon compliance the respondent must pass a final order on merits expeditiously and the bank attachment will be vacated. The taxpayer must also file a substantive reply to the show cause notice within the same period treating the impugned order as an addendum. Failure to comply permits the respondent to recover tax as if the petition were dismissed.
Remittance of a GST demand alleging misuse of GST credentials was ordered back for fresh adjudication on merits, conditioned on the taxpayer depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within thirty days; upon compliance the respondent must pass a final order on merits expeditiously and the bank attachment will be vacated. The taxpayer must also file a substantive reply to the show cause notice within the same period treating the impugned order as an addendum. Failure to comply permits the respondent to recover tax as if the petition were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
