Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Two distinct authorities issued separate demands and penalties for delayed filing of GSTR-3B returns for the same period, resulting in duplication of proceedings and double taxation; the impugned administrative action was held unsustainable and consequently quashed, with the writ petition allowed. The legal points focus on duplication of proceedings as a bar to multiple demands for the same tax period, the resultant double taxation, liability for interest and penalty arising from delayed GSTR-3B filings, and the availability of writ relief to challenge overlapping tax proceedings.
Two distinct authorities issued separate demands and penalties for delayed filing of GSTR-3B returns for the same period, resulting in duplication of proceedings and double taxation; the impugned administrative action was held unsustainable and consequently quashed, with the writ petition allowed. The legal points focus on duplication of proceedings as a bar to multiple demands for the same tax period, the resultant double taxation, liability for interest and penalty arising from delayed GSTR-3B filings, and the availability of writ relief to challenge overlapping tax proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
