Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Wrong entries in GSTR-3B concerning Input Tax Credit were rectified through filing of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, and the rectification mechanism negated any short payment or excess-claim consequence; therefore issuance of recovery notices was unjustified where GSTR-9C was filed. Misclassification of IGST as CGST/SGST did not cause revenue loss because the excess ITC remained available to government and was not actually availed to discharge CGST/SGST liabilities. The impugned recovery action based on alleged excess ITC claim is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.
Wrong entries in GSTR-3B concerning Input Tax Credit were rectified through filing of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, and the rectification mechanism negated any short payment or excess-claim consequence; therefore issuance of recovery notices was unjustified where GSTR-9C was filed. Misclassification of IGST as CGST/SGST did not cause revenue loss because the excess ITC remained available to government and was not actually availed to discharge CGST/SGST liabilities. The impugned recovery action based on alleged excess ITC claim is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.