Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Wrong entries in GSTR-3B concerning Input Tax Credit were rectified through filing of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, and the rectification mechanism negated any short payment or excess-claim consequence; therefore issuance of recovery notices was unjustified where GSTR-9C was filed. Misclassification of IGST as CGST/SGST did not cause revenue loss because the excess ITC remained available to government and was not actually availed to discharge CGST/SGST liabilities. The impugned recovery action based on alleged excess ITC claim is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.
Wrong entries in GSTR-3B concerning Input Tax Credit were rectified through filing of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, and the rectification mechanism negated any short payment or excess-claim consequence; therefore issuance of recovery notices was unjustified where GSTR-9C was filed. Misclassification of IGST as CGST/SGST did not cause revenue loss because the excess ITC remained available to government and was not actually availed to discharge CGST/SGST liabilities. The impugned recovery action based on alleged excess ITC claim is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
