Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reversal of input tax credit was predicated on classification of...
Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed with limitation exclusion
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reversal of input tax credit was predicated on classification of goods as non-exempt though the show-cause notice did not raise that ground; the notice failed the legally required specificity and the adjudication proceeded beyond the matters pleaded, breaching principles of audi alteram partem and statutory notice requirements, and therefore the adjudication order was set aside. The respondents remain free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, subject to exclusion of the period from February 24, 2025 until disposal of the writ petition or receipt of certified copy when computing limitation for any new proceedings.
Reversal of input tax credit was predicated on classification of goods as non-exempt though the show-cause notice did not raise that ground; the notice failed the legally required specificity and the adjudication proceeded beyond the matters pleaded, breaching principles of audi alteram partem and statutory notice requirements, and therefore the adjudication order was set aside. The respondents remain free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, subject to exclusion of the period from February 24, 2025 until disposal of the writ petition or receipt of certified copy when computing limitation for any new proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.